season
Apr 03, 2026

Federal Judge Strikes Down Trump’s Order Barring Wind Energy Projects

A federal judge on Monday invalidated a directive issued by President Donald Trump that had blocked the advancement of wind energy projects nationwide.

The order — formally titled the “Temporary Withdrawal of All Areas on the Outer Continental Shelf from Offshore Wind Leasing and Review of the Federal Government’s Leasing and Permitting Practices for Wind Projects” and commonly referred to as the Wind Memo — was signed on Jan. 20, 2025.

It instructed federal agencies to suspend new or renewed permits, leases, rights-of-way, and other approvals for both onshore and offshore wind developments while the administration reassessed federal wind policy.

U.S. District Judge Patti Saris of the District of Massachusetts, a Clinton appointee, ruled that federal agencies’ implementation of the memo was unlawful, effectively blocking the administration from enforcing its restrictions on wind energy approvals.

Seventeen states, Washington, D.C., and the advocacy group Alliance for Clean Energy New York (ACE NY) filed suit challenging the directive, arguing that the order violated the Administrative Procedure Act.

Judge Saris agreed, ruling Monday that the administration’s halt on wind project approvals was “arbitrary and capricious” under the APA.

She further concluded that the freeze was “contrary to law,” noting that federal agencies are obligated to process permit applications within a reasonable timeframe.

Saris wrote in her decision that federal agencies had not provided any substantive justification for suspending permit activity other than citing the presidential directive.

She also found that the agencies failed to meaningfully evaluate the relevant factors or conduct the necessary analysis before implementing the freeze, falling short of the procedural requirements of federal administrative law.

Can a Totally Inexperienced Person Become a Federal Judge? - Marzzacco  Niven & Associates

“This scant administrative record makes clear, and the agency defendants do not meaningfully dispute, that the agency defendants have not ‘reasonably considered the relevant issues and reasonably explained the[ir] decision’ to implement the Wind Order,” Saris wrote in her ruling.

She added that the defendants “candidly concede that the sole factor they considered in deciding to stop issuing permits was the president’s direction to do so.”

Her ruling entirely vacated the memo, ending the nationwide freeze.

“Under Joe Biden’s Green New Scam, offshore wind projects were given unfair, preferential treatment while the rest of the energy industry was hindered by burdensome regulations,” White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said in a statement to Fox News Digital.

“President Trump’s day one executive order instructed agencies to review leases and permitting practices for wind projects with consideration for our country’s growing demands for reliable energy,

effects on energy costs for American families, the importance of marine life and the fishing industry, and the impacts on ocean currents and wind patterns,” he added.

Other posts